Search options (Page 246 of 359)

"synthetic CPU only" scores only matters for profiles selection and the value is independent of selected frame size in SVPmark

and it gets 1714 when you include the GPU

you don't understand the idea 

profiles level X consume 100% of CPU Y
"Xc" will consume 100% of CPU in "CPU only mode"
"Xg" will consume 100% of CPU in "GPU accelerated mode"

if your CPU is faster than Y*K - you'll get profiles X
if your CPU is slower than Y*K - you'll get profiles X-1

for the real life additional coefficient K is used, lets say, 1.2 or 1.3

Nintendo Maniac 64
why are the default 720p settings more conservative than the default 1080p settings in a specific profile?

because "level 4" systems are as good in 720p playback as "level 5 systems"
and "level 3" systems as good as "level 4" and "level 5" in SD video
there's almost no point in pushing settings beyond "default" values ("default" for the FRC algorithms, not for specific profile)

Nintendo Maniac 64
overly conservative

50% tolerance

Pentium G3258 is detected as 2g when in reality it handles 4g just fine

I hardly believe
What is "4g" profile for FHD for example? Those settings allow "SVP Reference system 4" (note "4" at the end ) to playback 1920*1080 video at ~90% CPU load.
"Reference system 4" is 6-cores Phenom II X6 at 3.0 GHz and it gets 1589 SVPmark scores (87 fps in "good" sub-test).
Your G3258 gets 1144 scores and 57 fps.
So may be it can, under some conditions, play 720p with 4g settings but definitely not FullHD.

kibumm
Left is SVP, Right is Bluesky.
Occurring Artifacts in Bluesky are so clear.

looks like just very aggressive scene change detection plus "blend on scene change"

kibumm

so, if we forget about CPU usage, which one is better?

is AMD FMV limited to some video/codec types, source and resulting frame rates, etc?

please share your experience

http://www.svp-team.com/wiki/FAQ#Script … _be_opened

some anti virus software installed?

h.265 - никак
только с geforce gtx 960

YT 1080p requires TWO different streams to be loaded and played simultaneously.
PotPlayer can't do this (at least via command line) while MPC-HC can.
End of story.

ffdshow is using avisynth
video player is using ffdshow

Mystery
what performance difference on 15 threads? ... I would love to see that as well.

the same

BTW I was able to build AVS 2.6 + MT + our own patches, and it almost working BUT they've changed something in caching algorithm so it eats memory really fast and crashes.
And I really don't like to dig into this ... crap one more time
So I'd prefer to stick with "official" build if it's possible.