Mystery
Making it less conservative;
nope
it's better when a new user see SVP working and CPU is not overwhelming rather than SVP is stuttering right after clean installation
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Mystery
Making it less conservative;
nope
it's better when a new user see SVP working and CPU is not overwhelming rather than SVP is stuttering right after clean installation
MPC-HC can decrease playback speed by 2/4/8 times and if you set SVP to x2/x4/x8 you may get what you want
At least it looks pretty good for x2.
It may be necessary to try different video renderers cause in my rig EVR CP is dropping frames in this mode while plain EVR does not.
And keep eyes on SVP profile selected cause when you decrease speed in MPC-HC, SVP may automatically change profile to lower one.
i's a very quick test but with big error value
in fact it's not "synthetic CPU" but only one sub-test called "CPU: search (multi-threaded)"
this's by design
Nintendo Maniac 64
the 720p settings in the 2g profile seem conservative while the 1080p settings in the very same 2g profile seem accurate
well, may be
problem is I don't have that "reference system" anymore which means if I'm going to update profiles I should recheck all of them with the new "reference system"
"synthetic CPU only" scores only matters for profiles selection and the value is independent of selected frame size in SVPmark
and it gets 1714 when you include the GPU
you don't understand the idea
profiles level X consume 100% of CPU Y
"Xc" will consume 100% of CPU in "CPU only mode"
"Xg" will consume 100% of CPU in "GPU accelerated mode"
if your CPU is faster than Y*K - you'll get profiles X
if your CPU is slower than Y*K - you'll get profiles X-1
for the real life additional coefficient K is used, lets say, 1.2 or 1.3
your CPU gets 841 "CPU points" in SVPmark
level 1 = <550
level 2 = <1000
level 3 = <1300
level 4 = <1800
level 5 = >1800
Nintendo Maniac 64
why are the default 720p settings more conservative than the default 1080p settings in a specific profile?
because "level 4" systems are as good in 720p playback as "level 5 systems"
and "level 3" systems as good as "level 4" and "level 5" in SD video
there's almost no point in pushing settings beyond "default" values ("default" for the FRC algorithms, not for specific profile)
all4you4
Чем темнее цвет в фильме, тем фиолетово-сиреневенее становится свет на стене. Причем яркий цвет.
Это особенность конкретных светодиодов и/или контроллеров, фиг знает.
Они продолжают светить даже при самой минимальной установленой яркости, причем левыми цветами.
В призматике это решается только одним спсобом - там есть порог полного отключения светодиодов. Типа, если яркость меньше порога, то выключить совсем.
С высокими значениями порога смотреть просто неприятно, слишком явно и слишком часто мигает (полностью отключается) подсветка.
В SVPlight есть такой же порог, не большой, не регулируемый.
На моих подопытных комплектах - помогло, по отзывам других пользователей - тоже.
Вам, видимо, повезло меньше.
Nintendo Maniac 64
overly conservative
50% tolerance
Pentium G3258 is detected as 2g when in reality it handles 4g just fine
I hardly believe
What is "4g" profile for FHD for example? Those settings allow "SVP Reference system 4" (note "4" at the end ) to playback 1920*1080 video at ~90% CPU load.
"Reference system 4" is 6-cores Phenom II X6 at 3.0 GHz and it gets 1589 SVPmark scores (87 fps in "good" sub-test).
Your G3258 gets 1144 scores and 57 fps.
So may be it can, under some conditions, play 720p with 4g settings but definitely not FullHD.
Manvadher
When loading the profiles, it selects 1g. Is my PC really that old and slow?
it should select 2g for these scores
still you may choose 2g manually
kibumm
Left is SVP, Right is Bluesky.
Occurring Artifacts in Bluesky are so clear.
looks like just very aggressive scene change detection plus "blend on scene change"
About AFM Mode
Mode 0: Default setting and behavior depends on the GPU/APU
Mode 1: Created 2 original frames and 3 interpolate frames when converted 24p to 60p
Mode 2: Created 1 original frame and 4 interpolate frames when converted 24p to 60p
So "mode 1" maps to "1m" in SVP and "mode 2" maps to "uniform".
kibumm
so, if we forget about CPU usage, which one is better?
is AMD FMV limited to some video/codec types, source and resulting frame rates, etc?
please share your experience
Странный вопрос для этой ветки.
Предполагается что каждый юзер линуха, в принципе умеющий запустить в нем mpc-hc, сам знает все ответы
some anti virus software installed?
may be interesting - http://superuser.com/questions/842203/h … gressively
I didn't tried this
h.265 - никак
только с geforce gtx 960
one more time - mpc-hc IS patched
always
YT 1080p requires TWO different streams to be loaded and played simultaneously.
PotPlayer can't do this (at least via command line) while MPC-HC can.
End of story.
.exe file only
ffdshow is using avisynth
video player is using ffdshow
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.