MistahBonzai
EVR-CP is not good for 4k@60. Plain EVR works much better.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
MistahBonzai
EVR-CP is not good for 4k@60. Plain EVR works much better.
set "motion vectors precision" to "two pixels" and "decrease grid step" to "disabled"and you'll save a lot of memory
also decreasing number of threads can help
although my CPU's certainly got a lot of overhead left
do you really have 4K screen? otherwise you're dealing with 4K source downsized to your screen ![]()
SupRo
матрица там честные 120 герц, зачем она тогда?
надо ж ттх заранее читать
Kodiack
There're always extensive and intensive ways for improving something.
x64 is an extensive way and optimizing things to make 4K working on 32-bit is intensive way.
I prefer 2nd one ![]()
Still I admit that 8K video definitely will need x64 ![]()
Kodiack
Is there any way that I can use SVP with 4K
try latest Avisynth 2.6 MT build - http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=148782
also upcoming SVP update will have better compatibility with 4K
James D
dlr5668
done
Thor
I don't see it.
VP9 DASH format may not be available for any video
Thor
switched to vp9....video works ok but I have no sound.
you need to check "show VP9 amd MP4 (VP9 preffered)"
and then use "VP9 (*)" streams
then it will have "Audio: Vorbis 44100Hz stereo" in video properties in MPC-HC
... or switch to VP9 streams
MistahBonzai
What's a good utility for verifying the AviSynth.dll being used?
upcoming SVP release
- you don't need it
- current build of AVS+ x64 have some vital issues with ffdshow x64
541
После установки нового БП SVP отказалась корректно работать
Звучит странно.
Мы же все понимаем, что работа SVP никак не зависит от БП, да?
Значит если ситуация именно такая, как описано, то надо заменить 600 Вт на 650 Вт
Единственное, что зависит от БП - рабочие напряжения. Значит можно посмотреть на просадки напряжений/частот на CPU/GPU во время работы под тяжелой нагрузкой.
Но доктор Хаус учит нас что "все врут", поэтому мне кажется что происходило что-то еще, кроме замены БП...
Interpolation up to 144 fps requires some mid-range video card plus needs more attention to both video driver and video renderer settings.
Getting FullHD @144 fps from i7 w/o any external video card can be rather tricky.
dlr5668
this one
yep
James D
dlr5668
The issue about ffdshow buffers is fixed in the latest AVS+ commit on github.
In fact that commit is extremely essential for SVP but it wasn't "officially" released yet.
Mystery
can mobile devices properly render 60fps?
Not all of them and not in any resolution. 50 fps video has better chance to be played back w/o frame drops than 60 fps and output to external screen via MHL usually works better.
iXBT.com lab always make video playback tests in every mobile device review, but it's in Russian...
Mystery
Attached is my edited generate.js file.
yeah
it should be
SetFilterMTMode("DEFAULT_MT_MODE",2)for latest AVS+ builds
James D
you may want to set internal ffdshow buffers to some larger values (20 frames for example) for AVS+ to work correctly ![]()
just an advice...
так надо ж не "ffdshow video decoder", а "ffdshow raw filter"
Mystery
while the CPU is running @ 17%
obviously you're doing something wrong and it's not running in MT mode
Mystery
are you saying there is already a newer build of AVS+ MT that actually works?
latest public one was r1779
Mystery
If ffdshow runs - SVP runs. If not then not.
What exactly is your question? Why DirectShow filters are in use in some "weird" places?
Everyone can get AVS+ MT
it isn't secret
And it needs only three lines of JS code to make SVP work with it.
James D
I noticed that you like to protect old technologies and classic ways even if you know arguments against it
not even close
but I know AVS 2.6 in any way is not a "new technology" comparing to AVS 2.5
and I know x64 gives nothing to SVP
still AVS+ is great and we're looking forward to make it the base for SVP x32/x64
Mystery
There's no "new Avisynth".
AVS 2.5.8 "SVP edition" was aimed at reducing memory consumption only, it had the same peak performance as "official" build.
We're still not sure it's really needed to mess with AVS 2.6 RC 1/2/3 "SVP editions".
For re-encoding AVS+ is the best choice.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.