You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
tigerman
No, I think it's something else, may be overheating?
SVPmark is a kind of stress test, for example my laptop (i5-2430 + AMD video) can't pass FHD tests at all because of GPU overheating.
mark007
Are you able to reproduce the memory growth on you're end with my avisynth script and svp_scheduler=true?
This's not the most important task now, I'll take a look later, after 3.1 release 
But you may do some experiments on your own with the script and simple console tool called "avs2avi". This will exclude player, renderer and all that stuff leaving only decoder and avisynth processing.
GTX 550 Ti
ver, gpu total, gpu calc
295.73, 3372, 676
285.58, 2358, 367
Same results (two times difference) on GT540M.
But some people said there're HDMI audio output issues with 295.73 
THX-UltraII
I don t understand because it does not make sense.
Lets say we've got 1 fps video - 1 frame each second. With 5/2 frame interpolation the output'll be 2.5 fps:
1st frame - at time 0, 2nd - 0.4 second, 3rd - 0.8 second, 4th - 1.2 sec, 5th - 1.6 sec an so on.
Imagine that red circle is an object moving from left to right.
In the interpolated frame sequence this object will be at positions of the black dot.
Maken1
i cant smooth 1080p 29.97
the fastest option is frame double with 1st SVP shader
Itchywolf
I think someone was asking if you could watch Blurays with Potplayer and SVP, you CAN do it with Slysoft ANYDVD HD, they give you a free 21 day trial period, and it runs in the background and removes the copyright encryption found on blurays and allows any AVC/H264 player to play a protected Bluray.
Oh, cool, thanks for info 
Не всякий» — значит какой-то может.
Не значит. Не надо обобщать шакалов 
Ты на 22-й вопрос ответил? Он ровно такой же, только слова другие.
Логика вообще-то разная бывает
Ну да. Бывает логика, а бывает женская. Еще бывает нечеткая, но это сложно. Больше не знаю.
mark007
InterFrame.avsi
Oh I've almost forgot
So lets start with if you'll see the same issue with standard SVP script ?
NightFox
Условие что если тряхнуть, то начнётся стрельба. Дальше по условию ей тряхнули — значит стрельба началась. Что тут не так?
Тряхнули когда-то, без указания времения трясения. Период между трясением и началом стрельбы тоже не указан. Т.е. по отношению к текущему моменту вполне могли уже тряхнуть, а стрельбы еще не было.
Если есть больная, значит есть и здоровая. Чем этот ответ неправилен?
Только тем, что здоровых может и не быть. В исходном утверждении о здоровых вообще ничего нет.
Ну это уже к условию имеет отдалённое отношение.
В условии, как и в "задачках", чистая математика, ничего личного. Спорить с таблицей умножения можно, но бессмысленно
THX-UltraII
Are we talking about that system:
Intel Core2Quad QX9650 with unlocked multiplier
2x2 GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G
MSI GTX460 Cyclone 1GB GDDR5
OZC ModXStream Pro 600W
W7 64-bit
?
mark007
Could you post here the contents of "Last launch log" and "AVS-script from last play" text files when you experienced the situation like on that picture?
mark007
the second is with svp_scheduler=false
I cant' see any numbers on this picture mark007
core i7 920
Is "Number of threads" set to default value?
A = "вы спите", B = "вы мухряете"
Известно, что (A => B). Какое из высказывание верно:
a. (A => B) => (B => A)
b. (A => B) => (^A => ^B)
c. (A => B) => (^B => ^A)
(^ значит отрицание)
2. Можно как в школе, написать на бумажке "матрицу истинности", т.е. для всех (4-х) входных значений A,B посчитать все три результата
2.1. Можно сразу отбросить заведомую фигню. Вар.A очевидно ложен, можно даже не проверять. В принципе, вар.B тоже Давайте докажем вар.C.
A B итого
t t t => (f => f) = t
t f не подходит под условие, т.к. при этом (A => B) ложно
f t t => (f => t) = t
f f t => (t => t) = t
Т.е. для любых допустимых входных данных результат - истина. Бинго!
mark007
I meant "one picture with svp_scheduler=true" (which is by default) and "one picture with svp_scheduler=false".
THX-UltraII
Is this normal?
No it's not. What if select "SD" video resolution in additional settings?
I cannot click the 'share results online' button, how comes that?
You've to pass ALL the tests without errors.
It's much easier in PotPlayer.
Or install LAV filters and add "ffdshow raw video decoder" in MPC-HC.
PerfectHal
I mean there's no point in training a deep knowledge of SVP 3.0.6 now cause the list of settings in 3.1 will be completely different
Maken1
I forget to say that it was with KMPlayer
"EVR CP" isn't a standard OS component, it's an interface that allows anyone to extend EVR, add some features and so on. So the actual performance of EVR CP may varies on different players and even different builds of one player.
What's going on with MPC-HC in your case?
mark007
with svp_scheduler=true I can see mpc-hc's memory usage in process explorer skyrocket really quickly, making this popup appear every minute or so.
With svp_scheduler=false, the mpc-hc memory usage both starts lower, and stays flat so perhaps theres something wrong with svp_scheduler=true MAG?
Please post here "Performance graphs" window screen shots with and without "svp_scheduler" enabled.
I only said that for most people madVR consumes more resources than EVR
PerfectHal
i mean how to set options on svp profile
wait for SVP 3.1, it'll be released really soon
OK, I give up then
Lets just admit that for extremely overclocked Core2Duo + two low-end video cards in SLI madVR is the best choice
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
