You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
your CPU gets 841 "CPU points" in SVPmark
level 1 = <550
level 2 = <1000
level 3 = <1300
level 4 = <1800
level 5 = >1800
Nintendo Maniac 64
why are the default 720p settings more conservative than the default 1080p settings in a specific profile?
because "level 4" systems are as good in 720p playback as "level 5 systems"
and "level 3" systems as good as "level 4" and "level 5" in SD video
there's almost no point in pushing settings beyond "default" values ("default" for the FRC algorithms, not for specific profile)
all4you4
Чем темнее цвет в фильме, тем фиолетово-сиреневенее становится свет на стене. Причем яркий цвет.
Это особенность конкретных светодиодов и/или контроллеров, фиг знает.
Они продолжают светить даже при самой минимальной установленой яркости, причем левыми цветами.
В призматике это решается только одним спсобом - там есть порог полного отключения светодиодов. Типа, если яркость меньше порога, то выключить совсем.
С высокими значениями порога смотреть просто неприятно, слишком явно и слишком часто мигает (полностью отключается) подсветка.
В SVPlight есть такой же порог, не большой, не регулируемый.
На моих подопытных комплектах - помогло, по отзывам других пользователей - тоже.
Вам, видимо, повезло меньше.
Nintendo Maniac 64
overly conservative
50% tolerance 
Pentium G3258 is detected as 2g when in reality it handles 4g just fine
I hardly believe 
What is "4g" profile for FHD for example? Those settings allow "SVP Reference system 4" (note "4" at the end ) to playback 1920*1080 video at ~90% CPU load.
"Reference system 4" is 6-cores Phenom II X6 at 3.0 GHz and it gets 1589 SVPmark scores (87 fps in "good" sub-test).
Your G3258 gets 1144 scores and 57 fps.
So may be it can, under some conditions, play 720p with 4g settings but definitely not FullHD.
Manvadher
When loading the profiles, it selects 1g. Is my PC really that old and slow?
it should select 2g for these scores
still you may choose 2g manually
kibumm
Left is SVP, Right is Bluesky.
Occurring Artifacts in Bluesky are so clear.
looks like just very aggressive scene change detection plus "blend on scene change"
About AFM Mode
Mode 0: Default setting and behavior depends on the GPU/APU
Mode 1: Created 2 original frames and 3 interpolate frames when converted 24p to 60p
Mode 2: Created 1 original frame and 4 interpolate frames when converted 24p to 60p
So "mode 1" maps to "1m" in SVP and "mode 2" maps to "uniform".
kibumm
so, if we forget about CPU usage, which one is better?
is AMD FMV limited to some video/codec types, source and resulting frame rates, etc?
please share your experience
Странный вопрос для этой ветки.
Предполагается что каждый юзер линуха, в принципе умеющий запустить в нем mpc-hc, сам знает все ответы 
some anti virus software installed?
may be interesting - http://superuser.com/questions/842203/h … gressively
I didn't tried this
h.265 - никак
только с geforce gtx 960
one more time - mpc-hc IS patched
always
YT 1080p requires TWO different streams to be loaded and played simultaneously.
PotPlayer can't do this (at least via command line) while MPC-HC can.
End of story.
.exe file only
ffdshow is using avisynth
video player is using ffdshow
"4gb patch" is a must in any case.
perhaps this should be written with big and bold red letters on every Wiki page
Mystery
what performance difference on 15 threads? ... I would love to see that as well.
the same
BTW I was able to build AVS 2.6 + MT + our own patches, and it almost working BUT they've changed something in caching algorithm so it eats memory really fast and crashes.
And I really don't like to dig into this ... crap one more time
So I'd prefer to stick with "official" build if it's possible.
Write: File 'C:\ProgramData\SVP 3.1\Logs\avsFPS.txt' cannot be opened
will be fixed in the upcoming version
James D
Options in installer: SVP AS2.5 Ready or 2.6 Ready
try to guess how many users will know the right answer
Mystery
I'd be curious as to how the previous 2.6 MT compares in performance.
SEt's MT patch was last changed in early 2011...
number of threads required, which doesn't change the number of threads that actually get created
Right. This's why I'm starting to think we could switch to SEt's 2.6 MT.
It's totally OK on systems with 8 GB memory.
BUT it can create problems on 4 GB memory AND make SVP almost unusable on less than 4 GB memory.
Just for the record, how many computation threads are needed for the maximum performance.
Graph shows how frames-per-second depend on number of MT threads.
AVS script is SVP-generated for frame doubling (x2) with GPU acceleration.
CPU is AMD FX-8350 (4 cores 8 threads, just like Core i7).
And every thread need its memory and increases inner AVS cache.
похоже на ютюбе способ кодирования utf-8 поменяли
было типа такого - "\u041e\u0431\u0443\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0449" (т.е. каждая буква закодирована в ascii-строку) , а стало просто нормальным (русским) utf-8 текстом
перекачай 1.2.5 c сервера, заменил
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.