Search options (Page 1 of 2)

I definitely hope that the artifacting will be reduced in the future I find myself spending more time changing settings during a movie than actually watching it.

Any chance that this will be looked into eventually?

On 3d blu rays with SVP running you can see when the scene changes that one video stream changes before the other. But since FFDshow tells me that the images are synced, i don't know what is causing this.

Okay MAG79 you can scratch what i just said about frame syncing. I just did some checking with the two ffdshow instances. and the image counter is exactly the same with SVP running as without SVP running. So i have no idea what is causing this.
But the issue still very much persists.

I need it because SVP 4 pro don't work properly with 3d blu rays. I asked Chainik to make it compatible some time ago and he did which was very awesome of him. But when turning SVP on the video streams go out sync so one stream is a little behind the other, which makes it unwatchable it is only by very little, like 1-5 frames.

This is the post i am referring to http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic … 98&p=1

I would just like to point out that using svp 3.1.7 with the settings Fabulist provided barely increases the smoothness of a 24fps video and requires twice the amount of processing power than what can be achieved with SVP 4 pro

I myself has been struggling with the amounts of artifacting that SVP causes for years now (still do) and have spent countless hours discussing and tweaking settings (also still do), and sometimes even given up on using it for periods of time. But just recently with the SVP 4 pro release and some updates later, i believe that SVP 4 can do a very fine job. (even though less artifacting would be Very much appreciated )

These are my settings:
I am very aware that this is not artifact free. But it is not possible to get artifact free without reducing the smoothness by like 80%
These settings are used with my blu-ray movies, so 1080p content.

SVP 4 free version is available now for free of course I think the pro version will always cost money. But it is incredibly cheap.

bump c:

Is it higher or lower Width of top coarse level settings that cause more artifacting?

I don't think having to manually syncing the videos will be a good solution. But i guess it will work temporarily.

Here are two images where the sync difference is easy to see. http://i.imgur.com/2XEzK4i.png http://i.imgur.com/4SBdbPB.png
I tried to use video Delay on one of the ffdshow instances, but that affected both video channels.

By screwing up the 3d, i mean that it seems to pop moving elements far out of the screen, like it's a lot closer to your face than it actually is, which makes it difficult to see clearly and it is very straining on the eyes.
example: If a person is in a room and the camera is not moving much or at all. and neither is he, there is no issue. But when the person in the room starts to move around, he will sort of be moved a lot closer to your eyes and it becomes difficult to see them and what they do clearly.

I can't test right now but i will do so in a couple of hours. I will do Fluency and tearing test. and try to better explain the artifacting as well.

also. i have my multithreading set to automatic, i don't know how to judge what value it should be set to on my system but MAG79's link said Always remember to judge the result by looking at the speed improvement not the cpu utilization.
So i guess i will figure it out when i get to testing