You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by scb
Pages 1
Insindro wrote:Could someone let me know how I’d be able to change my builder optimization level?
Line 137
Line 1179
Line 1297
Please do elaborate.. what is the impact of this? What are my options and how does it help? 
Now that ffmpeg 7.0 is out, has anything changed?
Tried 4.16 V2 Lite with the new MPV update a few days ago and it looks like the fast movement interference artifacts are almost gone now.
I noticed there is only a 'Lite' version available for 4.16. Does anyone know if that's how things will be from now on, just 'Lite' versions?
What does Lite even mean in practice?
it's strange because the wiki tells that the 4090 is capable of 4K 60fps
https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/RIFE_AI_interpolation
I think that will be with earlier versions of RIFE (<=4.9); later versions just need more horsepower.
We should either use "video-sync=audio" like Blackfyre's configs or nothing at all.
Referring to https://mpv.io/manual/master/
I believe video-sync=audio is the mpv default behaviour.
So should I be using auto-copy rather than auto? SVP appears to work either setting.
This is good to know, but what are the differences between the models? When should one pick a particular one? What are the different models best at? What are the quality differences?
Guys,
I still haven't seen a full explanation about the different between the 'normal' and 'lite' models of the same versions? What situations should I pick the 'lite' version over the 'normal' version of a model?
hvs wrote:I hope someone can guide me in getting Soap Opera effect using RIFE in SVP.
currently, the best quality that almost gets rid of the soap effect is models 4.12 and 4.13.
4.0->4.6: about the same quality and same performance
4.7->4.9: about the same quality and same performance, the performance cost +20% than 4.0->4.6
4.10->4.13: about the same quality and same performance, the performance cost +20% than 4.7->4.9
4.12lite, 4.13lite: performance between 4.7->4.9 and 4.10->4.13my recommended models are: 4.6, 4.9 and 4.13
Sadly I cannot afford the performance decrease of 4.13 however 4.9 V2 is a great compromise for me.
So what about 4.13v2 lite, how does that rank?
Could anyone fully clarify the difference between the regular models, the V2 models and lite models please?
e.g. 4.13 vs 4.13 lite vs 4.13v2 vs 4.13v2 lite.
It would help solidify my understanding!
When MPV 0.37 arrives in SVP, will it impact performance of RIFE?
Is it likely we'll see optimisations to improve performance, or is this pretty much going to stay the same even if quality improves?
Hello,
I'm fortunate enough to have a laptop with a 12GB 4080 in and I've been using SVP to playback 4k HDR videos (resized to 1440p) in real time @ 48fps with RIFE, which like another poster has said, looks smoother than 'Automatic @ 120fps'.
I've been exploring using SVPcode to do all the calculations up front. SDR colour space content works fine, but I notice that with HDR sources, SVPcode arranges a tonemapping rather than preserving the HDR colourspace. Is this an innate limitation of SVPcode?
I was hoping that because SVP could do the HDR processing in realtime, that SVPcode could essentially do the same thing in batch for watching on other devices later?
Pages 1
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by scb
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.