Search options (Page 33 of 354)

ещё раз обновление запустить

"Number of devices: 0" как бы намекает, что что-то тут не то

> and leave 4.4

why 4.4? just because the numbers are higher than 4.0?

ok, 4.0 was removed from the list, but 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 are still there, w/o any changelog or something like that
is 4.4 better than 4.2?

> Do you plan to update SVP with the newer models?

kind of... not exactly like this
there will be only ONE model bundled (*), plus you'll be able to add whatever model you want manually, by copying model's folder

(*) if you _know_ which one from 4.0 to 4.4 is the best in terms of overall quality - this is the right moment to tell

> I would very much encourage everyone to share their observations

buy a video card at last!

> Is there an improvement in quality and speed of interpolation?

no idea about quality, but 4.1-4.4 performance is the same as 4.0
4.5-4.6 are 10% _slower_

> на AMD Radeon SVP будет работать

если попрыгать с дровами, то будет

actually I need what is below this - the list of CDM's

there actually WAS an update a few weeks ago

---
you will see it now

> SVP allows real-time interpolation for 4K 10-bit HDR files, but needs Avisynth Filter for this

"Avisynth Filter" is a confusing naming cause there're _two_ different filters there, one for Avisynth and one for Vapoursynth
both supporting 10-bit and hdr

> It is said that the performance of Optical Flow is also improved by about 2.5 times

it only makes difference for interpolating 4k@60 to a higher rates

>  would you be able to implement this new AviSynthPlus-RIFE into SVP

yeah, will do... but there's no noticeable difference with a "Vapoursynth filter" - load times and performance are exactly the same
plus it requires an unreleased AVS+ build, crashes with the latest official release

да даже 4*4 иногда странно выглядит, еще мельче кмк особого смысла нет
плюс дальше обработка идет через CPU (пусть потом и заворачивается обратно на GPU), т.ч. в текущей архитектуре SVP вектора 1*1 просто положат проц, а на 4к так и 2*2

да и еще хз откуда они там берутся эти 2*2 и 1*1
в SDK для 2ххх они тоже были, но тупо считались интерполяцией из 4*4 в самом SDK
может в 3ххх это такая же интерполяция, но "спрятанная" в драйвер, мы ж не знаем
а если так, то смысла в этом никакого нет, SVP и так делает интерполяцию векторов до 1*1, но на самом последнем этапе

куртка - читер