26 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

raider10 wrote:
Honza wrote:
raider10 wrote:

Where can I find the 4.4v2 model?
I would like to try with him, with the 4.25vs model my speed is 20fps and I don't see that model to select, I only see 4.4

Thank you so much.

There is an external link at SVP Wiki page in RIFE chapter
Download there

Thanks, but 4.4v2 version is missing smile

https://github.com/AmusementClub/vs-mlr … e_v2_v4.7z

Go to forum: Using SVP

27 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

i'm with 4.25v2, you're using 4.4v2 ?

Go to forum: Using SVP

28 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

thanks, for those with rtx 4090, what fps do you get when transcoding 4k video ?

Go to forum: Using SVP

29 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

hello, when I use the transcode feature, *2 gives me 24fps for a 4k video (for the speed of generation, so it needs twice the length of the video), but anything above (like 2.5*, 3*, or 4*)will give me only 14fps.
I'm using a rtx 2080

What speed do you get and do you also get lower speed at anything higher than 2x ?

Go to forum: Using SVP

30 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

dawkinscm wrote:
oriento wrote:

the onnx file is available now

Yep. But it does not work properly with SVP. It might look like it is working but the engine parse crashes. Looking at the new vsmlrt script there are a lot of changes and I'm not sure which ones are relevant. Especially since SVP moved some functionality into helpers.py.

i suppose you must change 32 into 64

multiple_frac = 32 / Fraction(scale)

Go to forum: Using SVP

31 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

the onnx file is available now

dawkinscm wrote:
oriento wrote:

the onnx file is available now

Yep. But it does not work properly with SVP. It might look like it is working but the engine parse crashes. Looking at the new vsmlrt script there are a lot of changes and I'm not sure which ones are relevant. Especially since SVP moved some functionality into helpers.py.

i suppose you must change 32 into 64

multiple_frac = 32 / Fraction(scale)

Go to forum: Using SVP

32 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

another update (no changelog)
4.26 - 21M - 2024.09.21 | Google Drive 百度网盘

Go to forum: Using SVP

33 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

scb wrote:

4.25 seems good on performance!

yes, now it's 15% less fps than 4.22 lite v2 !

Go to forum: Using SVP

34 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

new release

4.25beta - 21M - 2024.09.19 | [Google Drive](https://drive.google.com/file/d/10RhXyy … share_link) | I am trying using more flow blocks, so the scale_list will change accordingly.

Go to forum: Using SVP

35 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

to test the performance you can use the transcoding feature

Go to forum: Using SVP

36 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

thanks for the update. I've tested and I don't see any performance gain or lose with rife 4.22 lite v2. Around 98fps for converting a specific video 1080

Go to forum: Using SVP

37 Reply by oriento

(3 replies, posted in Using SVP)

i ask here because it doesn't happen if I disable the vapoursynth filter (related to svp),sorry I should have mentioned that

edit :nevermind, it's a bug in madvr sorry smile

Go to forum: Using SVP

38 Topic by oriento

(3 replies, posted in Using SVP)

When enabling "smooth motion" on the madvr settings (which allow to smooth video when interpoling 24fps to 48fps, and then madvr interpolate to your refresh rate),
the video becomes almost desaturated, black & white.
Disabling smooth motion directly make it colored again.

i'm correctly using vapoursynth filter and avisynth is disabled. I'm using madvr beta 206
How can I fix ?

It wasn't happening with the stable madvr (which is really old)

Go to forum: Using SVP

39 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

redraiderj wrote:
dawkinscm wrote:
redraiderj wrote:

4.24 is out, anyone tried it?

Yep and and my advice is don't bother. v4.18 is still the best for live action and even the dev has updated the README to agree.

Thanks, but where can I see the readme?

https://github.com/hzwer/Practical-RIFE … /README.md

Go to forum: Using SVP

40 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I don't know why this have been removed from the readùe, but it was described as this : 4.24 (Inherited from 4.18 and fine-tuned)

Go to forum: Using SVP

41 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Blackfyre wrote:
oriento wrote:

I made a small test, 4.22lite show less artifact (on a specific scene with repeated patterns) than 4.16lite

I found the opposite, weird artifacts re-introduced in scenes that were previously fixed. Went back to 4.16_lite (v2) as it has been my main one since its release.

i only tested like 20minutes of video, I will test more later. 4.16 was having artefacts, 4.22 too, but a bit less.

what is your kind of artefacts you're seeing ? On what type ? Is it also on repeated patterns (like fence)

Go to forum: Using SVP

42 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I made a small test, 4.22lite show less artifact (on a specific scene with repeated patterns) than 4.16lite

Go to forum: Using SVP

43 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

4.22 lite is out !

Go to forum: Using SVP

44 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

New version
4.19 (Add SportsSlomo) - 2024.07.12

Go to forum: Using SVP

45 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Xenocyde wrote:

RIFE 4.17 is out with no lite version. Testing now.

L.E.: Not sure what this new version is supposed to improve... I'm getting quite a bit more more fast movement artifacts compared to 4.15 and 4.16.

4.17 - 2024.05.24 | Google Drive | 百度网盘 : Add gram loss from FILM, need to fully assess the impact.

Go to forum: Using SVP

46 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

i'm seing artifacts in 4.15 lite that i don't see in 4.15

Go to forum: Using SVP

47 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

is there any comparison for frame.resize ?
I mean if it downscale to 1080p, why then starting from 4k and not start with 1080p ? You're not really playing 4K then

Go to forum: Using SVP

48 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

it's strange because the wiki tells that the 4090 is capable of 4K 60fps
https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/RIFE_AI_interpolation

edit: he said that even 4.9 he can't reach more than x2, or I misunderstood

Go to forum: Using SVP

49 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

are you using v2 and "performance boost" enabled with your 4090 ?

Go to forum: Using SVP

50 Reply by oriento

(2,526 replies, posted in Using SVP)

dawkinscm wrote:

Rife v4.15 is out. It is a clear improvement over previous models for reducing double images in fast movement. I need to do some testing but I think it uses a little more GPU than previous models because even with v2 my GPU never drops below 100%. Packet drops sometimes happen when starting or when FF/REW but settles down quickly with no further drops during playback. No obvious regressions from previous tests.

where is it available ?

thank you smile

Go to forum: Using SVP