Search options (Page 163 of 236)

Мне не надо fps. Мне нужен SVPmark Score, вместе с буквами.

Epic86
у меня как бы в svp ускорение включено, но всё равно тормозит
SVPmark сколько доступных GPU-ускорителей видит?

lkk_12342001
Thank you for your help to make SVP more international.

I see both logs are identical from view to settings folder and smooth properties for the file.
I see one little mistake in english log:

SVP-manager must be close but it continue its work. It is strange. But it is not cause of performance difference between users.

Check GPU-acceleration (OpenCL): true in both cases.
And look at filters list in both cases. You must find differences there. I think it is decoder and renderer.

We have some international improvements in SVP 3.1.3 beta and we need to test it.
Would you like to become international SVP beta tester?

PsykoTenshi
Thank you. I saw the same picture with "hill" at memory use graphic. It is dynamic subtitles. It was not enough time to make some tests with it.
I will compare different subtitle filters and renderers to find better.

TCmullet
I think that you have very long chain of video recording from net:

And I think you need more short chain like this:

No decode. No encode. No Losses and no CPU load. Save stream "As Is".
What will you say?

you saying that internally you change it to 120fps and (also internally) decimate by 2?
Yes. It processed internally. And it is optimized. It works without rendering decimated frames.

Does InterFrame come up with whatever is needed to allow any combination of input and output FPS?
Yes. You can use any combinations of these FPS. But you can get maximum quality and minimum CPU load if you using multiply FPSs: from 25 to 50 fps, from 30 to 60 fps, from 23.976 to 47.952 fps.
Or fraction multiply with low devider: 24 * (5:2) = 60, 23.976 * (5:2) = 59.94.

In first case all source frames are saved in the output video, in second case only - only part of source frames will be saved.

PsykoTenshi
I have never seen such strange memory usage line.
Can you share this file to me or part of it what shows such behavior?
I will take a look

I looked at one of hard cases: AVC Hi10p 4:4:4 (50fps but only 720p)
H.264-444-10bit-sample (1,4 MB)
It showed 30% of CPU usage with ffdShow decoder and 25% CPU usage with LAV decoder. Hi10p decode now is software only.
CPU: Core i5-2300 2,8 GHz

theosoph
Сравнить оба уплавнителя (тот что в мониторе и SVP) и решить для себя, имеет ли смысл.
Что за монитор?

%username%
Да, ситуация получила развитие как раз по твоему сценарию. Переставлять винду sturm уже не будет, т.к. никакой нормальный пользователь не будет копаться со старым железом, если приехало новое и работает с нуля лучше старого. Поэтому мы никогда не узнаем реальную причину потрескиваний X-Fi звука на AMD

---
Раз так волнует судьба SVP и есть интерес к развитию пакета, то может того... К нам в бета-тестеры?
Отправил подробности в личном сообщении.

In usual case 24 fps is better than 25 fps to be interpolated to 60.
You are almost right. 24 fps encreased to 60 fps by added several interframes. Formula is 5:2. That mean to add 4 new frames and decimate 1 from each 2 sorce frames.

But I tell about real 24 fps.

Your fps after capturing is not real. It is fake fps. No guarantee that all frames are at it's own positions. You need not to capture. You need to save video stream with no changes or with minimal changes.