1 (edited by Syndicate 25-11-2018 22:51:23)

Topic: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

Hi Gents,

I am having a dilemma. Please have a look at the attached benchmark screenshot.
Is it possible, that SVPmark 3 is less suited for the high thread count of current CPUs compared to the latest SVP 4 full version?
So I am having a hard time to believe, that a 6C/12T 8700K is slower than an 8C/8T 9700K in real world usage with SVP 4.

Thank you for your insight.

Post's attachments

1svp.png, 8.44 kb, 581 x 238
1svp.png 8.44 kb, 349 downloads since 2018-11-25 

2hevc.png, 8.87 kb, 581 x 233
2hevc.png 8.87 kb, 334 downloads since 2018-11-25 

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

Everything is possible cause SVPmark uses very old Avisynth 2.5 32-bit, plus the video size used in benchmark is 1080p, which is too simple/too small for such CPUs.
Still 9900K is faster than 9700K so obviously it works somehow wink

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

Will there be an updated SVPMark tool?

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

I dunno...  We could add the latest Avisynth+, switch to the 64-bit version and add 4K tests but the results won't be compatible with the old version, so... will it worth it?

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

I believe it would make sense to start a 64bit SVPmark "4". Perhaps with 4K/8K test cases in order to make it future proof?

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

not the 1st- (2nd-/3rd-) priority task in any case

7 (edited by Hennyo 28-11-2018 10:47:02)

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

SVPmark "4" would be nifty for 120/240hz 8k that are coming, it may not make sense as a first priority though could probably make sense for the newbies to interpolation.
24frame HDR>SDR Tonemapping is good and would be great if it could be enabled in 60+fps.

Re: SVP 4 vs SVPmark 3 multithreading

It seems like SVPmark 3 isn't available to download anymore. Also my downloaded copy can't verify my forum account.