Topic: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

im using palitstream gtx 680 and its not working it just crashes everytime i use potplayer w/ svp

i also followed the suggested solution in the other thread for gtx 680 but still it doesnt work

downloaded svpflow plugin and extract everything in the svp plugins folder is that correct?

any suggestion to fix the problem?

thanks

  • MAG79
  • SVP developer
  • Offline

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

Armas013
1. What version SVP are you using? 3.1.2?
2. Post here error details (number and error text).

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

this is what written in log.txt

20:31:59.405; ===== Detected playback with ffdShow. Duration: 6 ms
20:31:59.410; GetDimensionAndFPS_Grab start. Duration: 514 ms
20:32:00.925; GetDimensionAndFPS_Grab start. Duration: 499 ms
20:32:00.423; GetDimensionAndFPS_Grab start. Duration: 515 ms
20:32:01.939; GetDimensionAndFPS_Grab start. Duration: 500 ms
20:32:01.439; GetDimensionAndFPS_Grab start. Duration: 164 ms
20:32:01.602; GetDimensionAndFPS_Grab result: 1920 1080 23.999
20:32:01.618; T1T: begin. Duration: 20 ms
20:32:01.639; T1T: GetAllMediaParams
20:32:01.639; T1T: SettingsPrepare. Duration: 9 ms
20:32:01.649; T1T: Preparing smooth playback...
20:32:01.650; T1T: WriteAllMediaParamsToIni
20:32:01.654; SVPMgr: main "C:\Users\Armas\AppData\Roaming\SVP 3.1\" 1920 1080 23.999 1920 1080 5 2. Duration: 84 ms
20:32:02.739; ===== Playback
23.999 * (5 : 2) = 59.997 fps
20:32:02.739; SetPriorityPlayer: 2. Duration: 301 ms
20:32:02.041; RefreshSVP
20:32:02.042; ===== Waiting for ffdshow video

i dont see any error it just crashes totally clueless

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

http://www.svp-team.com/wiki/FAQ#Video_ … time_error
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php … ost4350329

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

ive tried avi, m2ts, and mpg files all crashed

anyway ill probably going to end up using without hardware acceleration

btw great job on svp!!!

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

have you read those links?  hmm

SVP can eat a lot of memory especially with multi-core CPUs with GPU acceleration enabled. This is not an issue with the default MPC-HC distribution but other video players may crash when memory consumption exceeds 2 GB limit for 32-bit process.
Luckily there's a simple solution for all that memory issues called 4GB patch from NTCore. Just run it and select video player's (or video encoder's) executable file.

PotPlayerMini.exe is NOT patched by default

  • MAG79
  • SVP developer
  • Offline

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

Armas013
Have you player crashes at small files (not Full HD)?

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

yes ive tried that 4gb patch already...also im running i5 3570k at 4.3ghz and 8 gb ram.

yes even small files like wmv still crashes...

  • MAG79
  • SVP developer
  • Offline

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

I mean small resolution not small file size.

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

just tried low res files still crashes

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

yes ive tried that 4gb patch already...also im running i5 3570k at 4.3ghz and 8 gb ram.

yes even small files like wmv still crashes...

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

ok, let's test your rig with SVPmark wink

in two modes:
1. with acceleration through GTX680
2. with acceleration through HD4000

13 Reply by Armas013 (edited by Armas013 04-07-2012 16:01:52)

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

just finished running svpmark using gtx680

Post's attachments

svpmark_0407_2359.log 1.23 kb, 542 downloads since 2012-07-04 

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

hd4000 results

Post's attachments

svpmark_0507_0011.log 1.23 kb, 594 downloads since 2012-07-04 

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

hmm, seems to work just fine  hmm

I've got only two guesses:
1. it's a PotPlayer issue - try MPC-HC bundled with SVP
2. it's a 304.79 driver issue - try different version, 301.1 for example

16 Reply by Armas013 (edited by Armas013 05-07-2012 04:05:48)

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

tried mpc-hc and still it crashes

i was about to uninstall 304.79 and i noticed that 1.1opencl for intel was installed in my system. so i uninstalled it and tested again.

and finally potplayer w/ svp works with hardware acceleration...

thanks a bunch...

  • MAG79
  • SVP developer
  • Offline

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

Armas013
That's great!
Congratulations!

Solution:
Uninstall another (Intel) OpenCL driver.

Issue status: Solved

  • Thanks: 1

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

how can I understand how many OpenCL or which OpenCL driver installed?

  • MAG79
  • SVP developer
  • Offline
  • Thanks: 1101
  • Thanks for the post: 1

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

recepky
Try Geeks3D GPU Caps Viewer.

  • Thanks: 2

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

I also have an HD 4000, with no additional GPU. If I uninstall Intel OpenCL to use SVP, won't it affect the other programs I use that depend on the Intel Media SDK?

Are you still expecting the next version of SVP to work with the Intel version of OpenCL? I noticed there's a new beta version of the Intel Media SDK--do you think that might include an OpenCL fix? I'd really like to try SVP, but it sounds like it's not compatible with my current setup.

Re: [SOLVED] Ivy Bridge + GTX680 - gpu acceleration still not working

jkauff
Are you still expecting the next version of SVP to work with the Intel version of OpenCL?

yeah but don't expect too much, it'll be just a workaround with lower rendering quality