You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
TCmullet
I'm afraid I just don't have enough words to explain.
Any explanation here needs at least a whiteboard to draw on, unless you'll natively speak Russian 
In fact I can't tell I fully understand how it really works...
You can start from there 
James D
Процессоры слишком умные стали, вручную не всегда рулятся...
А у всяких ультрабуков еще и производители самодеятельность блокируют.
TCmullet
this's a very small ball
while "promo graphic" demonstrates a car about 1/4 of a video frame
... or see this - http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic … 233#p44233
дык, один не правильно сказал, остальные не правильно поняли...
dlr5668
Автор утверждает
Какой еще автор? Там автора нет. Фамилия автора Zachs.
I just was answering to mashingan about hd5670
cause i've got hd5670 and i don't like it
Nintendo Maniac 64
"hw decoder" means "hardware video decoder used for decoding video stream"
Nintendo Maniac 64
I know that in my system it works like this:
- 800p + hw decoder = working
- 1080p + hw decoder = stuttering
- 1080p + sw decoder = working
And itsn't about CGN but about UVD...
mashingan
there's very simple solution - turn off hw decoding for 1080p
full 1920*1080 + SVP isn't working on 56xx cards
and 1920*800 works well
mashingan
How about HD5670?
From GPU Compability, it has quite high rating
"that rating"'s "100%" is exactly at 60 fps * 100%
so for 144 fps it should have "rating" >= 240%
mashingan
How about HD5670?
i've got it and it sucks on hw decoding of 1920x1080 videos 
If TS doesn't have $40 than may be you're right
but according to his question - he has
anyway gf210 can't even make 60 fps, according to SVPmark database
in fact it is slower than intel hd2500
Simple question - simple answer.
Why make it so complicated?
Nintendo Maniac 64
Rendering 144 fps on cpu is very heavy while rendering them on a low end gpu is pretty fast and gives higher quality. And offloads cpu for more useful tasks.
do you really think it's relevant to the topic?
can I use newer svpflow2.dll with older svpflow1.dll?
no
this one definitely should work
this time I tested it
something like gt630 i think
TCmullet
try this
[deleted]
James D
so context menu would be opened with right click button only, not both left and right
what 
?
Mystery
Does it only affect areas that have artifacts
yep
in theory
mashingan
I think really interesing part is
after I overclocked from 4.2Ghz to 4.7Ghz, under the exact SAME SVP setting which worked fine with no delayed frames or dropped frames in MPC+Madvr, the amount of artifacts decreased.
this's why I was asking about 'placebo'
cause I'm sure, as a developer , that SVP won't change anything in case of overclocking from 4.2 to 4.7 
and if he see something after overclocking - I can't even imagine what he possibly could find in a different video player
Blackfyre
after I overclocked from 4.2Ghz to 4.7Ghz, under the exact SAME SVP setting which worked fine with no delayed frames or dropped frames in MPC+Madvr, the amount of artifacts decreased.
are you familiar with the term "placebo"?
Blackfyre
it leaves SVP with a bigger head-room to use those resources (both the GPU for GPU-Acceleration & the CPU for making frames), thus resulting in less artifacts, because SVP has more resources to work with...
Good point but SVP is not smart enough to change settings according to available resources.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.