Problem with SVP 3.0.5 (Page 2 of 3)

No overheating I put a Zalman cooler to the CPU and it's installed well.

I updated my profile with my system details. If U need any more information, please let me know.

if HT=ON, why on your's screen of the "Perfomance graph" only 4 cpu?
in the device manager how many cpu? it must be 8 (4 real * 2 HT = 8 CPU)

Right. I'll doublecheck later today.

Maybe there's a cause, why everything shows 4 core instead of 8. There were a topic, about optimizing the boot process, where windows usually not uses all cores, and on that article, they suggested to set the cores to 4 (which windows uses for boot only). Apparently it seems, that it also limits the cores after the bootup. Thank You Microsoft... again!

Now I'm at my workplace, I'll try to find that setting and modify it to 8 or back to 0 (which means auto) later today, and will post up the results.

Thank You all! It may solve this problem.

Strange, that I experienced no any slowdowns on any other programs. Since the computer is well and running without any freezes or so, I don't have to use the task manager, so I did not realize that Win7 actually uses only 4 cores (maybe 2 physical and 2 HT, or I don't know how Windows distributes the cores). Also I don't have to use the device manager too much times, since there were no any problems with the computer before

Yes, maybe that's happened. Only for this very CPU intensive application, SVP.

I'm wondering what would be the normal load for CPU as well as GPU w/default settings of SVP.

I hope Chainik or MAG79 knows the answer

I'll present my results, after I get to home. I think that damn core setting would solve my performance issues with SVP. I just wanted to ask, that usually, what CPU/GPU load could I expect on a system like mine, when playing 1080p MKV movies.

I just want to know an absolute general load. This system a little bit high-end, that's why I want to know.

If there is 30% CPU/90%GPU load in general on a system like mine, and I get 80/80, it means that something is still wrong in my system. If I get let's say 35/91, I'll be happy, because not too much deviation from the general numbers

Thanks MAG! Could SVP evolve in a way, that using the GPU more and the CPU less? Is there a way to give more job to the GPU?

Or future releases are going exactly this way?

Let's take a closer look at very simple SVPmark synthetic calculations. No codecs, no avisynth, even no real video here.

Your results: 447 in single-threaded mode and 1003 in multi-threaded. 1003/447 ~= 2 = number of physical cores.
And compare it with real i7-960: 462 in single-threaded (almost the same value) and 2042 in MT. 2042/462 ~= 4