I haven't tried it since it is paid after 30 days.
Anyway the benefits of using a custom pelclip are only slight, I wouldn't worry about it too much smile

EEDI2 produces better results for this purpose than NNEDI2 or NNEDI3 (both ABS and non-ABS).
It is very slow, so it is only used in the Placebo preset smile

53

(17 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Which variables do sadml and sadgamma correspond to in the regular MVTools2?

54

(17 replies, posted in Using SVP)

MAG79 wrote:

SubJunk
Thanx a lot. We hears about DSS2. Does it way have any lacks?
One lack is requiring avss.dll from Matroska Haali distr. But it is not big trouble wink
And the second DSS2 need another MT mode. I think it is =1 but it needs more testing.
Can you help us with DSS2 best MT mode?

DSS2 has no audio support, other than that it is superior to DirectShowSource to my knowledge smile
I recommend SetMTMode(2) for it.

I will probably have some questions for you later when I have finished testing, thanks for welcoming me here, MAG79 smile

Chainik wrote:

Fight! Fight! Fight!!!  big_smile

We aren't competitors smile

55

(17 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Cool smile One more thing, I noticed you are using DirectShowSource which is not frame accurate. When I encoded samples to test with your script I noticed some frames were missing.
Using DSS2 instead will fix it smile

56

(17 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Cool smile Though there is no point in comparing them because InterFrame is primarily for encoding wink

Edit: You will see that the speed of InterFrame can far exceed yours at different presets, but there will be quality loss at faster presets too. Right now I am doing tests to learn tricks from your code, so the next version of InterFrame will hopefully incorporate them.

By the way, feel free to use any tricks from InterFrame you want. Hopefully we can help eachother to make our scripts better smile

The DeGrainedSource part can be useful and has almost no performance hit

57

(17 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Chainik wrote:

With MSmoothFps right now you can get the same visual results as MFlow/MBlockFps/MFlowFps, but the math is really different

Are you saying there is no difference in terms of visual quality between MSmoothFps and the others?

58

(17 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Hi,
Firstly, this is a cool program. I really like it.
I am the developer of an AviSynth script called InterFrame, so we have similar goals smile
What are the differences between MSmoothFps and MFlowFps/MBlockFps? Is there documentation for that function?
Also, what about MFinest()?
Thanks