Search options (Page 9 of 10)

Gippy thanks for information.

In the past D3D11 Native value in LAV decoder was incompatible to SVP.
Need to check if it works correctly and SVP does its work fine (24 to 60 fps conversion).
---
I've checked. D3D11 works good with SVP.
In LAV decoder filter properties it indicates as Active Decoder: d3d11 cb direct

Guys,

I still haven't seen a full explanation about the different between the 'normal' and 'lite' models of the same versions? What situations should I pick the 'lite' version over the 'normal' version of a model?

roshin1401 wrote:

Im noob to this software. While using TensorRT, a cmd popups doing compilation. Does this occur for every video file opened? or only once? And  also please suggest best rife model for my gpu. Its a 3070 laptop.

I'm having the same problem and unfotunately this post wasn't responded to.  I've put the .OONX files in the "models" and/or 'Rife" folders as instructed and yes, they do show up in the AI models pulldown in the SVP manager, but when I select it and try to run a video, a CMD box pops up and after a few seconds goes away.  The video then plays but is not converted.  Nor does the little green text in the lower left corner come up telling you what setting you're using, etc. Tres bizarre.  Plus, if I try to transcode the video it doesn't work either.  Says conversion failed. 

It seems pretty straitforward, I don't what I'm doing wrong here.  Please help!

RickyAstle98 wrote:

RAGEdemon wrote:

537.58 eliminated the pan stutters for me.

My permanent setup is now 4K (3840x2160) with RIFE 4.4 with this driver. RIFE/SVP is set to double the frame rate. (with RTX 4090 @ 65% GPU usage)

For those who don't know, this makes all content (24fps) into 48fps. You MUST make a custom resolution to make your refresh rate 48Hz, or it will be stuttery because 48fps does not go into the default 60Hz/120Hz that the vast majority of monitors/TVs are.

4K 48fps @ 48Hz video is perfectly smooth. This is easy for SVP because it is just doubling the frame rate.

Other modes such as sync 24fps video to screen refresh, or fps x 2.5, or whole multiples, is really taxing on the GPU. An overclocked 4090 can't do it, even on the highest performing RIFE (4.4/4.6).

Really why SVP developers cant develop RIFE-SVP swapchain? It will suit for everyone, any type of content, any resolution, almost everything! My general idea about this quiet simple, SVP algorithm almost 10 times less resource-sensitive, but intermediate frames quality rises at high frame rate video source, 2K 24>144fps ~40-60 watts with 8-12 px grid and 21 shader, whats the problem RIFE@4K 2x and then SVP with higher pixel grid? Its going to be really smooth!
With this swapchain, 24>96@4K easy! Double peformance for 4K sources...

You can probably modify base scripts (start at "C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\script\base.py") and chain rife+regular

Question, regarding RIFE I assume the 4070, 4070 Super, 4070 Ti Super, etc are all better than the RTX 3090 with regards to RIFE yes?

I'm asking because I can sell my RTX 3090 used for around $1100 in Australia, and just buy an RTX 4070 Super or 4070 Ti Super for example on special for around the same price.

3090 can no longer handle 4K at 2x with the latest RIFE models sometimes, if the 4070 and higher can handle it, I am willing to do the switch, despite having half the vRAM.

Output 8000 frames in 34.47 seconds (232.12 fps) 4.0
Output 8000 frames in 34.14 seconds (234.35 fps) 4.4
Output 8000 frames in 33.90 seconds (235.99 fps) 4.6
Output 8000 frames in 45.65 seconds (175.26 fps) 4.7
Output 8000 frames in 46.70 seconds (171.29 fps) 4.9
Output 8000 frames in 63.21 seconds (126.56 fps) 4.11
Output 8000 frames in 63.36 seconds (126.26 fps) 4.12
Output 8000 frames in 50.69 seconds (157.83 fps) 4.12 lite
Output 8000 frames in 63.61 seconds (125.76 fps) 4.13
Output 8000 frames in 50.31 seconds (159.01 fps) 4.13 lite
Output 8000 frames in 64.95 seconds (123.18 fps) 4.14
Output 8000 frames in 65.58 seconds (121.99 fps) 4.14 lite

4.14 lite is the most resource-heavy, dunno about the quality though.

RickyAstle98 wrote:

dlr5668 wrote:

v14 runtime + 4.14 v2 is perfection. Really nice update

Without +10% performance boost and +5% quality - not really nice update at all
Then please upload your v14 runtime and all folders - I will test

Cant you repeat steps? Here we go https://www.playbook.com/s/vadash/MFTzy … 49DgFraywF

RickyAstle98 wrote:

Sometimes force exact value prevent RIFE working, with new models too (mpv_cfr argument can also kick RIFE from workload) but I only use X factors because I have GSync monitor tech, I have smoothness all the time!
Force exact value = issues
Fixed frame rate = issues
Frame rate factor = no issues

are you using the newest vsmlrt.py?
then it won't work with fraction numbers.
https://github.com/AmusementClub/vs-mlr … 1847153063

TechnoStone wrote:

V2 models for some reason have jiggling, the more to the right and down, the worse the effect. Almost unnoticeable for 1080p, but very annoying for 1440p and 4K (both native and downscaled to 1440p, here's the example - https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … WGll8w.mp4). For this one, I'm running Game of Thrones S1 E1 at 4K on 3440x1440 (so SVP downscales to 2560x1440) at x2 framerate on 2080 Ti with 4.4v2, 4.6v2, 4.9v2 and 4.13_litev2. There's no such effect on V1 models (tried all same versions)

I have the same problem here too
tried using v14.4, but the problem was not fixed

V2 models for some reason have jiggling, the more to the right and down, the worse the effect. Almost unnoticeable for 1080p, but very annoying for 1440p and 4K (both native and downscaled to 1440p, here's the example - https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … WGll8w.mp4). For this one, I'm running Game of Thrones S1 E1 at 4K on 3440x1440 (so SVP downscales to 2560x1440) at x2 framerate on 2080 Ti with 4.4v2, 4.6v2, 4.9v2 and 4.13_litev2. There's no such effect on V1 models (tried all same versions)

RickyAstle98 wrote:

Wait me here, I will edit my message in next 5 minutes! Check plz!!!
So you need  to put 4.13.onnx into v2 folder where SVP located
https://ibb.co.com/RYCzGRh
If your 1st timing cache build failed, you need enable TRT boost option, 4.7-4.9v2 cant stable buld timing cache for general optimization... Maybe 4.13v2 too? Me too cant build timing cache without TRT enabled!
Yes I tested 60Hz and only CPU usage change a little, anyway I have modern 165Hz GSync monitor, any FPS factor, smooth always!

Ya so, for me, 4.13 V2 only works when I activate performance boost. Seems to be a bit more resource-intensive compared to non-V2, 50-60% 3D utilization. Need to specify that I capped GPU performance to 60 fps so it's using only 150 W instead of 300+ W, that's why it looks like my performance is not scaling well compared to your 144 Hz performance. I've been trying to get a new OLED screen for some time now, but every damned TV model up until now came with some annoying issue... maybe 2024 is the year I get a 55-inch OLED so I can use the GPU at its fullest.

Decided to test 4.13 and 4.13 v2.

4.13 works well, Win resource monitor shows ~50% GPU utilization regardless of the video resolution. I tested with 720p and 1080p videos at 60 Hz. Shouldn't there be some sort of difference between 720p and 1080p? 720p even reaches 60% more often on my RTX 4080. Also, the 4.9 model included with SPV by default now has almost the same performance, mostly sitting at ~50% regardless of resolution.

4.13 v2 doesn't seem to be working, however. Every time I try to play a video, it compiles the cache file and after around 50 seconds it stops and the video plays without RIFE. Can't really see if it gives an error cuz the window closes fast.