<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SmoothVideo Project — How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
		<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=5752</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5752&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 05:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75998#p75998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Chainik now I understand. <br />The additional gpu usage is not from svp creating more frames. <br />It&#039;s from the processing of those additional frames.<br />Thank you for SVP. Great software.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (cgrosgm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 05:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75998#p75998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75997#p75997</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&gt; But why does selecting &quot;no acceleration for gpu&quot; not reduce gpu usage?</p><p>SVP works just fine on Intel IGP so when it comes to 2080 we&#039;re talking about 1% usage</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Chainik)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75997#p75997</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75995#p75995</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>cgrosgm wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>2160p60 cpu:22%&nbsp; gpu:77%</p></blockquote></div><p> Can I ask you how’s your PC efficiency when playing 4K with 59.940 fps, 10 bit output and without any of the HW decoding via mpv player?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (otic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75995#p75995</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75993#p75993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes you&#039;re correct. svp is causing madvr to work harder. The higher gpu due to that. Not only svp.</p><p>But why does selecting &quot;no acceleration for gpu&quot; not reduce gpu usage?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (cgrosgm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75993#p75993</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75992#p75992</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Looks like svp uses 26% gpu</p><p>more like madVR</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Chainik)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 13:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75992#p75992</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75991#p75991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>James thank you for your reply.</p><p>What I&#039;m referring too is when svp is active cpu/gpu: 15/45<br />When svp disabled cpu/gpu: 4/19.<br />Looks like svp uses 26% gpu.</p><p>I would like to reduce gpu usage so I can allocate to madvr. <br />But selecting &quot;no acceleration&quot; for gpu has no effect.</p><p>Is there another setting to force svp to use more cpu and less gpu?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (cgrosgm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75991#p75991</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75989#p75989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>SVP doesn&#039;t take <em>much</em> of your GPU, at least for 1080p because it&#039;s been used on middle segment GPUs many years ago and the limiting factor was CPU.<br />Actually your example of miserable difference between GPU acceleraion On/Off is a living proof. It is disabled if you chose to...<br />...But obviously you could double check if your GPU is being used for DXVA hardware decoding in Potplayer in which case choose Nvidia CUDA Decoder.<br />(F5&gt;Decoders&gt;... for specific video format and choose Nvidia CUDA)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (James D)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75989#p75989</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How do I shift more workload to CPU (not GPU)?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75984#p75984</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>9900k<br />rtx-2080<br />32gb ram<br />win 10<br />potplayer<br />madvr<br />svp pro 4</p><p>1080p60 cpu:15%&nbsp; gpu:45%<br />2160p60 cpu:22%&nbsp; gpu:77%</p><p>would like to use less gpu for svp.<br />gpu for madvr. cpu for svp.</p><p>have sellected &quot;no acceleration&quot; for gpu but no change.</p><p>svp works beautifully. I love it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (cgrosgm)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 07:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=75984#p75984</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
