<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SmoothVideo Project — What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
		<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2421</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2421&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47379#p47379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In my case, ReClock can&#039;t detect 59.94 fps for mkv playback, but it can detect when playing other than mkv (like, mp4, avi, mpg, mov etc).</p><p>That&#039;s strange but not that I care, as long it doesn&#039;t disturb my watching experience, I let it be <img src="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mashingan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47379#p47379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47266#p47266</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I never use ReClock since my monitor can already natively run at 90hz, 96hz, 100hz, and 120hz.&nbsp; Not only that, but I&#039;m an audiophile first and a videophile second, so the last thing I want is my audio to be resampled.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Nintendo Maniac 64)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47266#p47266</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47265#p47265</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MaXimus</strong><br />Everyone must decide for himself.<br />I watched yesterday 50 fps video at 144 Hz mode with 3x smoothness factor.<br />50 * 3 = 150 fps. After ReClock&#039;s slowdown to 0.96x speed it makes maximum quality movements at video with maximum smoothness with minimum available artifacts. And with no jerks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MAG79)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47265#p47265</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47251#p47251</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I never install ReClock, useless</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MaXimus)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47251#p47251</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47202#p47202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation.<br /> I also found in the FAQ section that a faster processor is preferred over more cores.&nbsp; <img src="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jeff R 1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47202#p47202</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47183#p47183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tell about regulate jerks from one in 3 seconds to one in 15 minutes. It is very annoying jerks because all other frames (suggested) painted in time all at its places. Playback is smooth.</p><p>If you have 59.941 Hz mode and your video after SVP has 59.94 then you will see accumulated error 1 frame long every 59.941/(59.941-59.94) = 59941 sec = 16.6 hours. One jerk at 16.6 hours. So you can use 59.941 Hz mode without ReClock. Any movie is shorter than 16 hours <img src="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> You will not see the jerk.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MAG79)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47183#p47183</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47179#p47179</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the answer.&nbsp; <img src="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> <br /> 59Hz is actually 59.941...&nbsp; Interesting... Never knew that.<br />Is there any real advantage using the 59.951 setting over 60Hz ?</p><p> I occasionally get slight jerks in the video stream, but that even happens with the interpolation feature on my projector (SVP turned off)<br /> Some of it is attributed to the actual Blu-ray disc playing, I can hear it spinning up again when the buffer is emptied (if that makes sense).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jeff R 1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 07:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47179#p47179</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47153#p47153</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jeff R 1</strong><br />You can ignore ReClock installation. It gives you more artifacts and more CPU usage or regulate jerks. For example read <a href="http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=42382#p42382">this post</a>.<br />Did you see hidden setting NoJerksWithoutReClock and did you read comment near it?<br />(SVP tray menu - Information - Hidden settings)</p><p>What real refreshrate has your 59Hz mode?<br />You can see it in SVP additional information or in renderer info by Ctrl-J</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MAG79)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 05:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47153#p47153</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47138#p47138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What is the purpose of using Reclock with SVP ? Did a search on this and really didn&#039;t find anything.<br />I am thinking that since SVP is taking the native frame rate of a Blu-ray at 23.976 FPS and interpolating frame to 59.94 FPS, that I may not need Reclock.<br /> I believe this to be so since the NVIDIA control panel shows a refresh rate of 59 Hz available when hooked up to my projector. <br /> Is it better to have a faster processor or more cores ?<br /> I have a i7-4770k at stock speed running at 3.5 Ghz and has a turbo boost to 3.9 GHz.<br /> It can be pushed to what ever, but it will have to be water cooled.</p><p> I am also running a EVGA GTX 980, so is there any advantage to what you see in the screen shot as a setting ?</p><p> Thanks !&nbsp; <img src="https://www.svp-team.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jeff R 1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2015 19:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=47138#p47138</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
